The Shack

Buy from
Available at
Category: Contemporary
Date Published: January 1, 2007
Number of Pages: 304
Print Price: $7.20
eBook Price: $6.64

I have to admit I didn't give this book much consideration until I recently saw books - several in fact - about The Shack on a secular bookstore shelf – and The Shack was published in 2007! After reading the book, I can see what all the fuss (positive and negative) was about.

The story begins with an introduction to Willie, who narrates. He is a friend of Mack Philips. Mack goes to his mailbox one day to find an invitation from "Papa" to visit him at "the shack." There is already an element of the supernatural, as Mack soon finds out that, due to icy weather, the mailman never did deliver anything that day.

Also, "Papa" is the name that Mack's wife Nan uses to refer to God, and no one else would know this.

Mack and Nan had five children, but their youngest, six-year-old Missy, was slain by a serial killer while on a camping trip. Missy disappeared while Mack was rescuing two of his other kids after their canoe tipped over.

At first the angry Mack suspects the note is a cruel joke, maybe played by Missy's killer. But he does go to the shack – with a gun – while his oblivious family has made plans for the same weekend to visit Nan's sister and her family in another state.

Mack is greeted by "Papa," described to the reader as a large African-American woman.  (At the end of the book Papa takes the form of a man.)  Mack soon meets "Sarayu," an Asian woman, and Jesus, who looks like one would expect him to look.  It becomes clear to the reader that these three are meant to be the Holy Trinity.

I suspect this nontraditional take on the Trinity is where much of the controversy about the book lies.   However, as a Catholic, I have a few bigger problems with The Shack.

For instance, after Mack notices that the fictional Jesus is critical of "religion," Jesus says, "I don't create institutions – never have, never will." Oh really? How about “You are Peter and on this rock I will build my Church” (Matthew 16:18)?

The fictional Jesus goes on, "Like I said, I don't create institutions; that's an occupation for those who want to play God. So no, I'm not too big on religion, and not very fond of politics or economics either. And why should I be? They are the man-created trinity of terrors that ravages the earth and deceives those I care about. What mental turmoil and anxiety does any human face that is not related to one of these three?

Other problematic passages include when Sarayu (the Holy Spirit, you remember), in the presence of Papa and Jesus, says "yes" when Mack affirms that we don't have to "follow the rules.”

"In Jesus you are not under any law,” Sarayu says. “All things are lawful."

Sarayu says she doesn't like "religion" any more than this fictional Jesus does, adding, "Religion must use law to empower itself and control the people who they need to survive."

Young soon justifies all this undermining of traditional religion by having Sarayu liken one's relationship to God to a friendship – if there is an expectation of certain behavior or certain actions, the relationship is not one where two friends can simply enjoy each other and serve each other willingly, out of love and pleasure in each other.

Papa throws in her (his?) two cents, saying, "To the degree that you resort to expectations and responsibilities, to that degree you neither know me nor trust me." And Jesus adds "And to that degree you will live in fear." Papa tells Mack she has never been disappointed in him (or any of us).


That's disappointing – to hear that God doesn't want anything from us? He doesn't expect us to do our best for Him?

Despite all this silly extemporizing, The Shack is worth a Catholic's precious reading time, assuming the reader has been well catechized. There are no direct attacks on or even mentions of the Catholic faith. You'll feel like you've gone to the shack and that the same exchanges God had with Mack, He’s had with you.

My favorite part of the story is when Papa says to Mack, "[L]et's say that I know it will take you forty-seven situations and events before you will actually hear me – that is, before you will hear clearly enough to agree with me and change. So when you don't hear me the first time, I'm not frustrated or disappointed, I'm thrilled. Only forty-six more times to go."

Needless to say, Mack returns from the shack a changed man. "For the better" is what does need to be said. He has forgiven both his daughter's killer and his own father, who had been an abusive alcoholic.

The book gets pretty deep where it could have been superficial and light, but only briefly, and not so much that it turns readers off. It's not a perfect book, but it is nowhere near as scary as the book’s cover about it would have you suspect.

In the end, The Shack holds more good than harm.

ISBN-13: 978-1609414115
Original Language: English
Book Dimensions:

Subscribe to the weekly e-newsletter Catholic, Ink. - click here - receive book reviews and the column "The Catholic Imagination and You"

Be part of the Catholic Literary Revival.

Jeanie is an RN in Kearney, Nebraska. She blogs at Mystical Rows and The Jeopardy! Fan .

1 Comment

Sep 9, 2014 Karen Salstrom

I was disappointed to read this as the review of this decidedly disturbing book, from at least a Church Doctrine perspective. True, one could read this 'feel good', New-Agey book for the fictional pleasure one might crave, but for weakly catechized Catholics, it is truly problematic. In fact, for well-catechized Catholics, it would be one that would never be recommended. The depictions of the Trinity, along with specific doctrinal issues, caused me to balk. For example: P. 136: "Evil is only the absence of good, like dark is the absence of light." Although privation is a factor in evil, it is not merely the absence of good. What might come to mind is Satanic and demonic influences in our world. There is action and intent that accompanies evil...not mere lack of 'good.' P. 177 "religion, politics and economics are the man-created trinity of terror" This is a direct attack on organized religion (which includes the Mother Church). God is involved in all that Man creates, and directly so as in Joseph creating economic stability, the election of men to lead (which all Catholics ought to be informed on and vote according to the 5 non-negotiables.), and the formation of our own religious organization (See the Book of Acts to find how God moved the New Church to become organized.) P. 181-182: 'Jesus' "has no desire to make anyone a Christian"...WHAT????? So much for Evangelization! So much for loving all so that they might know Life in Christ! P. 203: 'In Jesus, you are not under any laws.' we are not under the Law of the Spirit, which is alive in Christ Jesus? We are not bound by our Covenant? So many Protestant Christians are enamored by this New Age drivel. In fact, a local Protestant pastor of a semi-mega Church did a series on the merits of The Shack. But where is discernment? In this Century, and particularly in this Country, we are an un- and poorly-catechized brethren (not being helped by too many of our 'don't rock the boat' Pastors). So to recommend a book like this that minimizes our Faith Tenets, reduces Christ to some Hippie Gardener who seems not to 'require' anything of anyone, the Holy Spirit as and portrays God the Father as a Black Mom that just wants to make you feel good is a blasphemous portrayal of The Triune God. Even the S. Baptists are concerned: In 2010, R. Albert Mohler, Jr., president of The Southern Baptist Theological Seminary, described [the book] The Shack as a "wake-up call for evangelical Christianity," and that its story reflected "a theology that is unconventional at best, and undoubtedly heretical in certain respects." He also blamed its popularity among Evangelicals on their ignorance of "basic theological knowledge." And NOW: there is a movie in the making, staring Forest Whittaker, possibly Oprah. So those who don't read will get an even more dangerous dose of heresy via the Big Screen. If you are believer in Christ, don't read the book for fear of receiving heresy into your understanding of the Truth. If you are an Atheist, don't read the book because you will never come to know the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob via this drivel. Irresponsible to recommend this book to ANYONE.

Leave your comment

Catholic, Ink.

Be part of the Catholic Literary Revival

Sign-up for this free weekly e-newsletter and receive the free article - "What is Catholic Fiction?" Read the weekly column The Catholic Imagination and You and more.

Search Books

Catholic, Ink.

Be part of the Catholic Literary Revival

Sign-up for this free weekly e-newsletter and receive the free article - "What is Catholic Fiction?" Read the weekly column The Catholic Imagination and You and more.